Easter Break, Time for Learning, What’s Normal?

With a lot of our student athletes competing abroad or going home to train, we have had a little more breathing space over the last couple of weeks!  (slightly)

We chose this period to complete a trio of educational seminars delivered to our high performance team at the University of Birmingham. Included in this team are strength and conditioning coaches, nutritionists, performance lifestyle consultants, sports psychologists and sports physiologists.

The three areas discussed were the Sporting shoulder, the hip and groin and the foot and ankle. We delivered presentations based around the up to date approach to assessing and treating these areas and further discussed how we can integrate with the performance team to ensure a speedy recovery from injuries. A persistent questions in all seminars was ‘what is normal?’, ‘what should I expect to see?’

So, what is normal? To define this you have to have extensive knowledge in a specific area, and a lot of people to help you complete research! ‘Normal’ is actually a unusable term in our area of physiotherapy. I prefer ‘optimal’. As each activity or sport has its own adaptations that make that particular joint or muscle work optimally, and so, redefining what is ‘normal’. To know this about a sport, research is done on the most successful athletes in those sports. You can then create a picture of the physical characteristics of the best performers in that sport, and you can be sure there will be a lot of similarities!

For example, in the shoulder, if you perform a sport that requires you to use a single arm overhead, (tennis, water polo, cricket) it is preferential for you to have different levels of strength across your two arms and this will create (not so subtle) postural changes. If you try and apply those same changes to a swimmer, you will find a lot of ‘non-optimal’ readings and observations.

Just look at this video of an athlete throwing a ball and watch how far his right shoulder rotates backwards, quite incredible! (you will be redirected to youtube.com to watch it)

 

So next time you are comparing yourself to what you think is ‘normal’, remember, you are a product of years of going about your business in a certain manner, we all develop differently!

 

Have a good few weeks!

 

Continued good luck to all our Commonwealth (ex)patients, you are doing us proud!

 

Slouching for healthy shoulders and good posture!

At Physiokinetic we see a lot of shoulder injuries.

They are most prevalent in people that complete activity in the overhead position.

Quite often this is also the main symptom that people will seek physiotherapy,

“I get pain when I reach up to dry my hair”

“My shoulder hurts when I reach upwards to turn the light on”

“I can hit a forehand but as soon as I try to serve I get shoulder pain”

Quite often these symptoms will come with a diagnoses of “shoulder impingement”.

This is an accurate description of the symptoms. However it is just that, a symptom of a problem, not a diagnoses.  The diagnoses is derived from what is causing the shoulder to pinch. This is due to multiple factors.

The most significant factor and improvement people can make in the early stages of injury is to relax and allow yourself to slouch! The misleading information that creates the need to relax comes from the ideal that sitting up straight and pulling the shoulders back is a good idea while you move the shoulder.

This causes more problems and can quite often worsen the symptoms of impingement. 

This is as a result of accidentally fixing the shoulder blades in once place.

The shoulder moves! To create space and to give you a stable platform for the arm to work, the shoulder blade needs to move forwards and rotate upwards. Any lack of this movement and the shoulder will function sub optimally.

To promote this movement I use the cue to relax and as the arms raise up overhead, expand the back between the shoulder blades. The exact opposite to pulling them back! upwardrotYou can try this now, simply try and hold your shoulder blades together and raise your arms, then do the same while relaxed and letting your shoulder blades move. Which is easier?

When you have the feeling of this you can then train to maintain the muscular balance around the shoulder to keep this rotation occurring efficiently.

 

Have a good week!

 

Dan

Short vs Long

When we see a client in our practice, we go through a series of important decisions. But one remains the most difficult, when do you focus on a short term ‘fix’ and then, when do you think about the long term?

Once we have a comprehensive history of the problem we will examine the area and develop a reasoned diagnoses. Straight away we then have to make a decision, do we concentrate on the injured area and continue to formulate a plan based on this, or do we continue to assess and find the reasons behind the injury and focus on the long term? Here lies the dilemma.

The main factors that will influence this decision are actually found out during our history taking and further signalled by our diagnoses. The most straight forward example to describe this is an acute muscle injury vs a gradual onset of knee pain.

For an acute muscle injury, it is most likely that initially we will focus on the injured tissue and be singularly focussed on managing that area, looking for quick, short improvements. These injuries are normally traumatic and come on suddenly and the explanation of the injury will reflect this. It would not make sense (and quite often you are unable) to start looking around the body for reasons why that muscular tissue has been injured. You wouldn’t put a footballer on a treadmill to look at running style the day after they have sustained a tear of their hamstring! Instead we identify the hamstring injury, get an accurate idea of the degree of injury, remove the factors that may worsen the injury (this may be running, or in extreme cases even walking) and immediately start to get that athlete moving in different ways. Quickly you would see improvements and then it logically makes sense to progress to looking at the long term and for reasons as to why they may have injured the hamstring area.

Conversely in the second example, a runner with a gradual onset of knee pain, it is logical not to get internally focussed on the injured area only. Instantly when talking to the runner we would see there was no clear reason why the injury occurred. We will most likely ask much more in depth questions as to the runners training history, their load management (see previous blogs) and look at the whole body to see why the knee is getting over loaded. This case would be appropriate to look at running style as there is likely to be a certain volume of running that the runner could do without pain. We then formulate a diagnoses and as before remove the problematic variables. Then we formulate the plan, involving rehabilitation for any of the issues we may have found with a focus on the long term improvement from the offset.

Obviously there are exceptions to these basic rules, but those exceptions still follow the same trends as above. You get an accurate diagnoses, remove the influences that could make the injury worse and then start the rehab process involving as much of the long term factors that you have identified as you can. It is more a question of when you look at the long term, not if!

So next time you are unfortunate enough to sustain an injury, think about the above to help you understand where your rehab focus needs to be!

If you have any questions please get in touch over on our facebook page!

 

 

 

Swimmer’s Shoulder Part 2: Rehabilitation

Athlete’s presenting with swimmer’s shoulder normally report pain in the subacromial region.  These symptoms may be associated with a range of pathology such a bursitis, capsulitis or tendinopathy. Diagnosis may guide medical treatment such as pharmacological intervention with oral medication or injections, however the multi-factorial nature of shoulder pain and the limited specificity/sensitivity of shoulder assessment makes diagnosis problematic. As such it may be more beneficial to focus on the impairments that are associated with the onset of symptoms (as introduced in the previous blog).

 

Most swimmers’ will report an insidious onset of pain and can not identify a single specific event that has caused their symptoms. The subjective is paramount in identifying contributing factors e.g. alterations in training type and load, while the physical examination can help identify the relevance of biomechanical impairments.

 

As discussed in the previous blog, Swimmers’ reporting sub-acromial pain often display, a forward head and rounded shoulder posture. This posture is associated with increased thoracic kyphosis, decreased cervical lordosis, protracted scapulae, and internally rotated/anterior humeral head. Soft tissue findings associated with this posture include restricted anterior shoulder musculature, lengthened and weak medial scapular stabilizers, tight glenohumeral posterior capsule, and weak anterior cervical flexors.

 

Physiotherapy, rehabilitation and strength & conditioning should focus on the demands of the sport (see previous blog) in the context of the presenting athlete. In an athlete presenting with symptoms modification of training type, volume or intensity may be required. Simply removing a particularly provocative S&C exercise may be sufficient to reduce symptoms enough for the swimmer to continue with their normal pool training load.  However it is likely that some reduction in load either through volume or intensity will be required in the interim to allow symptoms to settle and to allow a shift in focus to shoulder strengthening and posture re-training.

 

Postural impairments can be managed through a range of techniques including, soft tissue release of the anterior musculature, mobilisations of the glenohumeral joint and strengthening of scapular retractors and cervical stabilisers

 

Soft tissue release of the anterior musculature, most notably pectoralis minor can be useful in reducing muscle tone and reducing the anterior drawer on the humeral head.

It is useful to teach athlete’s to self-manage this through Trigger Point release and self-stretching.

 

Posterior Capsule Mobility can be increased via posterior capsule mobilisation in supine and self stretch techniques such as the sleeper stretch. Care must be taken with the sleeper stretch as there is an opportunity for it to generate an increase in compressive symptoms if not undertaken with care.

 

The role of the rotator cuff is paramount in preventing humeral head migration. The rotator cuff originates from the scapula and as such the scapula plays an important role in defining the length-tension relationship of the rotator cuff (Kibler, 1998). As discussed previously, swimmers’ with shoulder pain often display reduced activity in the muscles that stabilise the scapula e.g. serratus anterior, rhomboids and lower trapezius.

 

Mosely et al (1992) undertook a piece of research to assess the effectiveness of different prone exercises in recruiting the scapula stabilisers. Prone exercises are particularly favourable as they can potentially mimic common swimming positions. The results are summarised below:

prone exercise peak arc

 

These results can help assist in choosing appropriate exercise that focus on increasing the endurance of the serratus anterior, lower trapezius, and subscapularis muscles. The four most widely used exercises supported both in research and clinical experiences are scapular elevation (scaption), push-ups with a plus, rowing, and press-ups.  Some of these exercises may already be in a swimmer’s dry land programme and as such it is important to check technique and prescription. In my experience it works well to work to fatigue with these exercises, repeating 3-4 sets of each exercise per session. Given the high volume of pool based training these athlete’s undertake, it is useful to carry out these exercises after swimming or as an isolated workout session in order to minimise the effect on the swimming training. It is also worth bearing in mind that strength gains will be mitigated by cardiovascular training and as such 12-24 hours between pool and land training will contribute to more strength gains in a strength focused rehab.

 

Whilst there is a strong focus on scapular stabilisation within these 4 exercises, they also contribute to development rotator cuff strength-endurance. The prone scaption exercise for example (Y shape) as well as targeting the middle and lower trapezius fibres will also challenge the suprapsinatus (a key muscle in maintaining humeral head position). Whilst many practitioners will focus on attempting to isolate the rotator cuff with theraband exercises, I believe it is also useful to build in more functional complex movements that challenge the rotator cuff such as the military press, lat raises, lat pull downs and bent over rows.

 

Whilst many swimmers should be incorporating a dryland training it is valuable to liaise with coaches and the athlete to ascertain the content. There should be a focus on trubnk stability and strength endurance with an emphasis on pelvic positioning. Achieving a neutral pelvis and avoiding avoid excessive anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis is a key teaching point. Exercises that focus on improving dissociation of the trunk on the pelvis and the pelvis on the hips are fundamental. Common exercises to assist in the process are dynamic plank variations, mountain climbers, swiss ball exercises, deadbugs, bridging varitations and greyhounds.

 

Periodisation of rehabilitation with training

Swimmers are reluctant to remove themselves from pool training as such it is likely that you will need to advise on the adaptation of training schedules and techniques in order to allow the athlete to continue to swim to some degree but also achieve the desired rest and/or adaptation required from rehabilitation. Modyfing a swimmer’s training will likely gain increased compliance with rehab than completing removing pool based training altogether. In some cases it may be necessary to remove the athlete from the pool altogether for a short period-although this is very rare in my experience. Ultimately time spent out of the water should be minimised and adjustments should be made to maintain as much pool training as possible, e.g.

 

  • Temporary reduction in training volume/frequency
  • Avoid the use of hand paddles and kickboards which increase load/leverage
  • Use swim fins to enhance the propulsion from the legs and reduce the stress on the shoulder
  • Alter training patterns so that different strokes are used more frequently throughout the practice.

 

 

Further reading:

Kibler B. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:325–339.

 

Mosely JB, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, Tibone J. EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:128-134.

 

Scovazzo ML, Browne A, Pink M, et al: The painful shoulder during freestyle

swimming: an electromyographic and cinematographic analysis of twelve

muscles. Am J Sports Med 1991;19(6):577-582

Swimmer’s Shoulder Part 1: Aetiology

Author: Becki Knight, Sports Physiotherapist, PhysioKinetic

Swimmer’s shoulder is characterised by pain in the anterior lateral aspect of the shoulder, although sometimes symptoms can migrate down the arm and into the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint. It is believed that swimmer’s shoulder is due to subacromial impingement involving the rotator cuff tendon, bicipital tendon, or subacromial bursa.

So why are swimmer’s at risk?

Swimmer’s often present with hypermobile shoulders- specifically increased anterior glenohumeral laxity. So as with overhead athletes, they present with excessive external rotation and limited internal rotation. This greater range of external rotation places greater demand on the rotator cuff and the long head of the biceps to prevent elevation and anterior translation humeral head. Any failure of the rotator cuff or scapular stabilizers to maintain the position of the humeral head can lead to excessive humeral head migration and either increased load on the tendons or compression of the tendons between the humeral head and acromian. It is likely that a combination of both exists in swimmer’s presenting with shoulder pain.

So why does this happen?

The causes are likely multi-factorial and are thought to be a result of a combination of: –

  • impaired posture
  • impaired glenohumeral joint mobility-specifically internal rotation
  • poor stroke technique ( impaired neuromuscular control or proprioception-depending on your terminology!!)
  • reduced muscle performance (either activation or strength)
  • overuse/inadequate recovery-training errors

However if we analyse the free-style swimming technique it gives us some insight into the potential reasons as to why swimmers are so at risk from these symptoms

So what happens during a free-style swimming stroke?

The stroke is split into 2 main phases- Pull through (early, mid and late) and Recovery (elbow lift, mid and late) (Richardson et al, 1980; Souza, 1994). More simply-catch, pull, and recovery. The table below gives an insight into both the kinematics and muscle action during these phases.

Phase Muscle Action Kinematics GH Jt Kinematics Scapula
Catch Hand enters water Upper trapezius and the rhomboids.

The serratus anterior protracts, rotates the scapula up, and is highly active from this point in the catch and through the pull. These opposing actions hold the scapula in place.

External rotation and abduction Upward rotation and retraction
Pull Just after the catch, the pectoralis major adducts the humerus while internal rotation is balanced by the antagonistic external rotation of the teres minor. The latissimus dorsi and subscapularis activate from mid pull. Internal rotation and adduction Downward rotation and adduction
Recovery Hand leaves water The deltoid and supraspinatus are the prime movers through recovery. External rotation and abduction Protraction and upward rotation

So what implication does this have?

We can see from the table that the free style stroke will increase strength in the shoulder adductors, extensors and internal rotators. In fact swimmers often show a reduction in their external to internal rotator endurance ratios (Fowler, 1990). Falkel et al. (1987) argued that this ratio was correlated to shoulder pain in swimmers. They also postulated that when the ratio of external rotator to internal rotator endurance dropped below 50% the swimmer no longer had sufficient endurance to maintain optimal stroke mechanics during the recovery phase thus increasing the risk of subacromial pain. Pink et al (1996) argued weakness in serratus anterior and increased rhomboid activation during the pull to be responsible for pain in swimmers. They hypothesised that this muscle imbalance causes impingement of the biceps tendon and supraspinatus due to altered scapula kinematics.

Another key contributing factor for swimmers is the volume of training that is undertaken compared to other overhead sports. Johnson et al, (1987) assessed the training habits of several upper limb dominant sports. They reported that on the average shoulder revolutions per week of a golfer, javelin thrower, baseball pitcher and swimmer (see table below).

Sport Revolutions per week Injury incidence at Clinic
Golf 200 7%
Javelin Thrower 300 29%
Baseball Pitcher 1000 57%
Swimmer 16000 66%

These statistics may have actually been too conservative as Kammer, Young, Niedfeldt (1999) calculated that highly competitive swimmers actually perform more than 1 million shoulder revolutions per week. The implications for this are significant given that shoulder injuries are occur 30% and 38% of all swimming injuries per year (Bak et al, 1989 & Cole et al 2002). In fact, McMaster and Troup (1993) reported a lifetime shoulder injury incidence of 47% to 73% for competitive swimmers.

Rehabilitation and injury prevention.

 Treatment and prevention of this condition has historically focused on addressing high risk factors associated with the condition. Continual analysis of swim stroke is paramount to ensure that stroke mechanics are optimised for performance and injury prevention.

Exercises aimed at addressing deficits in muscle and joint function are the main stay of managing this condition. An example of common rehabilitation goals are:-

  • improve glenohumeral joint instability
  • reduce posterior capsule restrictions
  • improve muscle endurance specifically serratus anterior and subscapularis

A follow up article will focus on discussing rehabilitation strategies and exercise prescription.

 

References

Bak K, Bue P, Olsson G: Injury patterns in Danish competitive swimming. Ugeskr Laeger 1989;151(45):2982-2984

Cole A, Johnson JN, Fredericson M: Injury incidence in competitive swimmers. Presented at USA Sports Medicine Society and American Swim Coaches Association meeting; September 7, 2002; Las Vegas

Kammer CS, Young CC, Niedfeldt MW: Swimming injuries and illnesses. Phys Sportsmed 1999;27(4):51-60

McMaster WC, Troup J: A survey of interfering shoulder pain in United States competitive swimmers. Am J Sports Med 1993;21(1):67-70.

Pink M, Jobe F: Biomechanics of swimming, in Zachazewski JE, Magee DJ, Quillen WS: Athletic Injuries and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996, p 317

Souza TA: The shoulder in swimming, in Sports Injuries of the Shoulder: Conservative Management. New York City, Churchill Livingstone, 1994, pp 107-24