Self Help Tips for Desk Related Pain

arm pain

We find a lot of people reporting to into the clinic with upper limb or neck pain that they attribute to spending the majority of their day sat working at a desk or laptop.  In our clinic we see increases in this during other periods that are associated with increased desk time e.g. exam revision times, end of year deadlines.

 

Signs of work related musculoskeletal pain:

  1. Pain that only occurs when at work e.g. after sitting at for long periods, working at a laptop or computer,
  2. Pain that settles during holiday periods or change in routine
  3. Pain that increases with an increase in work volume e.g. deadlines, exam periods

 

How can you minimise the occurrence of desk related pain?

Whilst your desk set up and posture are important in minimising pain, the reality is that if you sit in any position for a long period of time- no matter what your posture is like, or how high the monitor is, you are going to develop discomfort and potentially pain.  That is not to say that optimal desk, monitor and keyboard set up isn’t important- they are a good starting point for optimising your work station for when you are sat at the desk. However the key is a regular change in position. Ideally a change in position every 20-30mins is beneficial in minimising the development of pain. Ideas to facilitate this are:

  • central printers away from your desk
  • drink breaks
  • standing and walking whilst making phone calls
  • going and liaising with colleagues rather than emailing
  • desks with variable desk heights (standing desks)

 

One key driver in minimising desk related pain is the exercising away from work. Research shows that the more active you are away from work the more able you are to tolerate being sat for longer periods. So exercising outside of work is really important. Building this into your day e.g. at lunch times can also facilitate a break from the desk. This can be as simple as a walk at lunchtime or a short exercise class.

 

So remember the key is movement, move often, exercise regularly and you will help minimise your chances of developing desk related pain.

Running niggles…how to self manage…

Runners-knee_SAG

With the London Marathon just days away and summer just around the corner, I thought I would discuss some common running niggles that can occur when you either start increasing your mileage or start running for the first time.

 

Achilles pain

The achilles tendon connects your calf to your heel bone. This like many other tendons often gets aggravated when you increase mileage too quickly or suddenly introduce a new activity. If you do start to experience pain over your achilles tendon it doesn’t necessarily mean you need to back off training completely but you should probably reduce some of your activity to allow symptoms to settle. A rule of thumb is if your pain stays below a 4/10 then you can continue with the activity. However if your pain starts to increase day to day or during activity then you need to consider reducing the amount you are doing. Alongside this most people with these symptoms require some additional strengthening for the lower limb. This may be calf strengthening or actually higher up the kinetic chain – e.g. hamstrings or gluts.

 

High Hamstring Pain

This is another load related injury involving the hamstring tendon. Common symptoms include pain on sitting, high speed running and hill running. Common mistakes with managing this are to stretch the hamstrings- this often maintains the symptoms and can make the symptoms worse. Basic management is to avoid high speed running and hills and to not stretch the hamstring. The best treatment for this is to undertake a hamstring loading program and you probably need some guidance from a physio as these conditions can be difficult to manage.

 

Knee pain- on the outside

The usual culprit for this is the Iliotibial band that connects one of the hip flexor muscles to the knee. Often people develop pain on the insertion of this band at the knee due to a particular movement pattern that causes the knee to fall inwards. Correcting this movement pattern will reduce symptoms. Strategies to correct this often include glut strengthening exercises and functional movement training e.g. single leg squat, hopping, step ups. Running gait analysis can sometimes be beneficial to identify any issues in this area.  

 

Knee pain- front

Pain in this area can have many causes but with runners it is often due to a combination of reduced muscle strength (usually calf, hamstring, gluts) and a similar movement pattern that we see with other knee pain that causes the knee to fall in. Addressing muscle strength deficits and correcting this movement pattern can have a big impact on reducing the symptoms.

 

On the whole most running injuries are a result of overload. Simple strategies of increasing mileage slowly and including plenty of recovery and strength work within your running programme can help mitigate a lot of issues. However if you do run into problems and need some guidance on managing symptoms and running load then it would be advisable to book in with a physiotherapist for a comprehensive assessment and rehab plan.

 As ever have a good Friday and Weekend!

 

Becki

 

 

The art of tapering…….

runningSo we are fully into marathon season so with many races on the horizon for the running community I thought I would discuss the value and art of tapering for race day.

Tapering before a marathon should ideally begin around 2-3 weeks out for most runners.

So what does tapering mean? What does it achieve?

Tapering is the opportunity for your body to get some recovery and rest from all the mileage you have accumulated throughout your training. Evidence would suggest that a 2-3 week taper allows muscle glycogen (energy stores), enzymes, antioxidants, and hormones to return to optimal ranges. It is also an opportunity for muscle damage that has occurred during high volume training to repair and this improves muscle strength. Immune function also improves meaning you are less likely to get ill leading into the race.

 

However a common mistake during this period can be to over taper! Here is some guidance on how to manage you load during this period….

Weekly Mileage

A reduction to 80% of your weekly mileage in the first week, 70% second week and 50% in the final week should be sufficient to provide the necessary physiological adaptations required without leaving you feeling sluggish on race day. So if your weekly mileage is 50 miles then your taper mileage for week would be 40miles per week.

Long Run Volume

Whilst you don’t want to eliminate long runs you should reduce the volume, most coaches would recommend reducing this by 20% week 1 and 50% in week 2.

Intensity

You should also make sure you maintain some intensity to your sessions. Training at race pace is still beneficial during this period. One higher intensity session per week will be sufficient in week 1, a moderate intensity session at 60% volume of your normal hard day. In the final week this session can be in the form of mini session e.g. 6-8 x 2mins at race pace with 2mins recovery.

The day before the race it useful to get out a do a light run. This has the benefit of stimulating the nervous system and provides some psychological comfort by alleviating nerves. An easy 3 miles would be appropriate.

Whilst this blog has provided some insight into the reasons behind tapering and given some examples of how to manage tapering load, it isn’t a one size fits all model. You will need to find a tapering model that suits you and best prepares you both psychologically and physiologically for the race. It takes time to develop a routine and be comfortable with a tapering regime, so the more you do the more you will find what works for you!

As always…. Have a great weekend from the Physiokinetic team!

Cheers Becki

A Royal Affair

So we’ve had an interesting week here at Physiokinetic!

We started the week with a Royal visit on Monday. The Princess Royal met Physiokinetic staff and some scholar athletes when she attended the site to officially open the Sport & Fitness Club.

Having discussed with the Queen’s daughter to some of the services we offer, I thought it would be a good opportunity to remind everyone of the diversity of skills we have to offer.

Physiokinetic we provide physiotherapy services to over 20 different sports at the University of Birmingham. Additionally, we are the regional provider of physiotherapy to the Talented Athlete Scholarship Scheme (TASS) which provides support to talented athletes aged 16 and over in over 30 sports.

Alongside this we also work in collaboration with Birmingham Children’s Hospital to provide physiotherapy assessment and rehabilitation services to children in the region. Our input supports children at a range of levels from accessing school PE, grass roots football and international para-skiing.

At Physiokinetic we understand the mindsets of patients and athletes of all levels. We understand the time sensitive nature of injuries and the needs of patients. As such we have developed a Sports Medicine Clinic that runs fortnightly on site to provide assessment for all our University Scholars, TASS athletes and patients. The service is headed up by Dr Kim Gregory. Dr Kim Gregory is the Chief Medical Officer for GB Para-Olympic Team at the Winter Olympics this year.

For those patients that don’t require sports medicine review we have worked hard to develop strong links with Orthopaedic Specialists in the area and have excellent knowledge of local services should patients need onward referral.  This is through both NHS and Private pathways and as such we can support all patients with their needs.

 

I hope this has provided some insight into the range of expertise and services we have here at Physiokinetic!

 

Have a great weekend

 

Bex

Snowboarding Injuries: Are they preventable?

Image result for katie ormerod

On the eve of the Winter Olympics reports that Katie Ormerod has suffered a double injury blow that will rule her out of the event has come as a massive disappointment for her and the British Team. Ormerod reports that she suffered a fractured wrist two days before the official opening ceremony, then in training the following day she suffered a severe calcaneus fracture.

We saw last week with Joe Breedon that injuries are part and parcel of being an extreme sport athlete. But how preventable are these traumatic injuries?

I thought today I would discuss how to prevent common snowboarding injuries. Whilst skiing injuries often involve the knees, snowboarding injuries by contrast tend to involve the upper extremities and head. When snowboarders fall they land on their hands, back, head and in free-style events a significant force will go through the board and feet. The most typical snowboarding injury is a wrist fracture. Other common injuries include the shoulder, neck and concussions

Unlike many sporting injuries that are related to overuse, ski and snowboard injuries are normally related to an acute traumatic event and as can be more difficult prevent. However, there a few things you can do to help minimise the risk of these injuries when you are on the slopes:

 

1.     Invest in some wrist guards- there is evidence that has demonstrated that these will reduce the risk. The guards should be flexible and longer rather than shorter with the splint palm side only.

 

2.     Wear a Helmet- evidence has shown that whilst wearing a helmet won’t eradicate your chances of getting a head injury, they can reduce the severity of head injuries.

 

 

3.     Learn how to fall. Avoid falling on out-stretched arms. See this video

 

4.     Do not over reach- stay on slopes and routes that are not too challenging and allow you to develop your skill level safely

 

Hopefully this has re-enforced some safety tips and ideas for all of you hitting the slopes this season.

Have a great weekend and enjoy the Winter Olympics!

 

Beckiormerod

Readiness to train: When to push on and when to hold back…

Happy Friday all!

We’ve had another busy week here at Physiokinetic. Having had a few patient’s come and see me after developing some overuse injuries I thought it would be useful to give you some tips on monitoring your training load.

When you’ve decided to undertake a training plan and commit to those hours running, in the gym, on the bike or on the pitch; missing sessions or not training hard every session can be a really difficult task. However; training too hard continually, without appropriate rest periods or down time can lead to injury and illness. Whilst we can never truly predict injury or illness there are subtle signs that can indicate when our likelihood of getting injured or ill is higher. We can use these to steer our training.

The first tool we have is the ability to monitor training and competition load. In professional sporting environments Sport Science Staff have the ability to monitor load through GPS tracking and Heart rate data. This data gives an insight into the external load placed on the body (e.g. GPS data, gym load) and the internal response (heart rate data). So how can we track this information without the use of GPS units? There is actually a relatively simple alternative that will allow you to track your load over time. It is an estimate, but it does give you a useful insight into how your training load fluctuates and may guard you against increasing your training too quickly.

Rating a session using a RPE score (rate of perceived exertion) you can estimate the load of a session by scoring it on a scale of 0-10 (1-very light à 10-very very hard).  By multiplying this number by the duration of the session we get an arbitrary figure which represents that training session. For example, a bike session that lasts 60mins at an RPE of 6 would give a TRIMP (training impulse) of 360. Using this method to rate your training sessions will allow you to ensure ‘easy’ sessions are actually easy and hard sessions are hard!

The second tool we can use is recovery monitoring. This essentially assess your readiness to train. We can use simple questions to monitor how we are responding to training and whether we need to modify our plans. Rating your levels of fatigue, motivation and sleep quality can allow you to quantify whether your risk of injury or illness may be higher.

The following questions are a useful start to monitoring your readiness to train:

Rate them on a scale 1-5 (1 poor- 5 Excellent)

How many hours sleep have you had?

How would you rate the quality of your sleep?

How rested are you?

How motivated are you to train?

 

If you just starting out on monitoring your training and responses, then it will take a few weeks in order for you to assess what is normal for you.

Hopefully you’ve found this useful and given you some tools to start to monitor your own training and readiness to train!

 

Have a great weekend!

Becki

Same injury….different athlete….

Hi all.

This week has been a busy week for us with the final stages of the British Junior Squash Open at the weekend and with many of the University’s Scholarship athletes returning from their Christmas break. There have also been lots of discussions within the department about several high profile athletes injury stories in the press over the holiday period.

I think one of the most contentious and high profile stories is Zlatan Ibrahimovic’s return from anterior cruciate injury (ACL). Whilst he has received huge praise for his dedication and determination to return at 7 months, many medical professionals have registered their concern about his early return.  Adding fuel to this debate is the player’s injury ‘recurrence’ which has seen him side-lined for at least another month at the end of December.  So why has he had a recurrence? Well this could be down to many factors. Being absent from training and playing for such a significant period will always make you more susceptible to another injury. Moreover he may have had additional injuries alongside the ACL which have been aggravated on his return.

So the big question did he return too soon? There are many factors that are used to determine an athlete’s readiness to return; these include strength, cardiovascular fitness, movement analysis and psychological readiness. Undoubtedly Zlatan Ibrahimovic would have met all of these targets before returning to training and match play. Many ACL rehab specialists will advocate a minimum of 6-9 months before returning to competitive sport. I think taking into account the research related to re-injury and the significance of the surgery I think it is reasonable to aim for a 9 month return to sport in the professional environment.

Does this differ for your amateur athlete? Ultimately yes. Professional athletes have the luxury of being able to focus on their rehabilitation full-time and the ability to work with physiotherapists and strength and conditioning coaches on a daily basis. So what does this actually mean? Well… there’s no juggling of work and rehab; when there’s those days that you just don’t feel like hitting the gym there’s people there to motivate and encourage you and essentially force you to the work that you need to do! This will have the ability to help professional athletes meet their goals sooner than amateur athletes.

So when thinking about amateur athletes sustaining significant injuries requiring complex surgery I would always look to allow 12 months before returning back to the previous level of sport. Juggling work, family and life commitments all take their toll and do have a negative impact on rehabilitation. Setting a target of 12 months is realistic and allows for not only the recovery from the injury but also gives the time to develop skill acquisition, confidence and reduce the fear of re-injury.

Here at Physiokinetic we deal with a wide range of athlete’s from amateur to fully professional. We are able to tailor rehabilitation to meet the lifestyle and goals of the patient. So if you need advice on management of an injury come and see us!

Have a great weekend from all at Physiokinetic!

Thanks Becki

 

How to reduce the risk of injury when starting new sports

man with back pain

Taking up new sports can be an exciting time… new friends, new routine, fitness gains. But there can be a downside to starting a new exercise regime….injury.

Most injuries that occur when starting new sports occur due to ‘overuse’. So what is the definition of overuse?

Overuse injuries are a result of tissue damage resulting from repetitive demand over a course of time. Taking up a new sport or training schedule can make you more vulnerable to these injuries as joints and muscles are being used in a new way. The term ‘training’ is often used without us really thinking about what the term means…so what does training mean?

Training has specific goals of improving one’s capability, capacity, productivity and performance. Simply in training we are looking to improve our capacity to undertake a particular activity. This can involve improving cardiovascular fitness, strength, speed or a particular skill. The majority of sports training will involve all of the above.

Improvement in a particular facet of training requires 2 key components. Firstly we have to challenge ourselves- if we continually train in a ‘comfort zone’ then we will not achieve any improvements- we must extend ourselves. It’s important it is done in a controlled manor as if we over reach to far then we risk injury. As such the second equally important component is rest. How does rest fit in? It is during rest that our body makes the necessary adaptations from training in order to improve. As such rest is critical in minimising the risk of injury from overuse.

The term overuse often makes us think of long excessive periods of training. However in reality overuse injuries can occur over a short period of time when the body is exposed to a sudden increase in load that is new. We call this ‘acute training load’. When there is a sudden increase in ‘acute training load’ then there is an increased risk of injury. Long term training load is termed ‘chronic training load’. We know from recent research that the ratio between chronic and acute training load is key in minimising injury risk. Often we look at chronic load being anywhere between 1-3 months and acute load 1-2 weeks.

 

So you can see that starting a new sport or activity brings with it inherent risk of injury if you do not gradually increase your exposure to the activity. So how can you minimise this risk?

 

  1. Make sure you have a good base fitness-this might involve some running, cycling, swimming.
  2. Give yourself adequate rest periods so that you can recover from your sessions.
  3. Slowly increase the time that you train and/or the intensity you train at.
  4. Make sure you do some general strengthening and balance activities e.g. press ups, lunging, step ups and balancing on 1 leg.
  5. Get guidance from a coach, strength & conditioning coach or physiotherapist

Swimmer’s Shoulder Part 2: Rehabilitation

Athlete’s presenting with swimmer’s shoulder normally report pain in the subacromial region.  These symptoms may be associated with a range of pathology such a bursitis, capsulitis or tendinopathy. Diagnosis may guide medical treatment such as pharmacological intervention with oral medication or injections, however the multi-factorial nature of shoulder pain and the limited specificity/sensitivity of shoulder assessment makes diagnosis problematic. As such it may be more beneficial to focus on the impairments that are associated with the onset of symptoms (as introduced in the previous blog).

 

Most swimmers’ will report an insidious onset of pain and can not identify a single specific event that has caused their symptoms. The subjective is paramount in identifying contributing factors e.g. alterations in training type and load, while the physical examination can help identify the relevance of biomechanical impairments.

 

As discussed in the previous blog, Swimmers’ reporting sub-acromial pain often display, a forward head and rounded shoulder posture. This posture is associated with increased thoracic kyphosis, decreased cervical lordosis, protracted scapulae, and internally rotated/anterior humeral head. Soft tissue findings associated with this posture include restricted anterior shoulder musculature, lengthened and weak medial scapular stabilizers, tight glenohumeral posterior capsule, and weak anterior cervical flexors.

 

Physiotherapy, rehabilitation and strength & conditioning should focus on the demands of the sport (see previous blog) in the context of the presenting athlete. In an athlete presenting with symptoms modification of training type, volume or intensity may be required. Simply removing a particularly provocative S&C exercise may be sufficient to reduce symptoms enough for the swimmer to continue with their normal pool training load.  However it is likely that some reduction in load either through volume or intensity will be required in the interim to allow symptoms to settle and to allow a shift in focus to shoulder strengthening and posture re-training.

 

Postural impairments can be managed through a range of techniques including, soft tissue release of the anterior musculature, mobilisations of the glenohumeral joint and strengthening of scapular retractors and cervical stabilisers

 

Soft tissue release of the anterior musculature, most notably pectoralis minor can be useful in reducing muscle tone and reducing the anterior drawer on the humeral head.

It is useful to teach athlete’s to self-manage this through Trigger Point release and self-stretching.

 

Posterior Capsule Mobility can be increased via posterior capsule mobilisation in supine and self stretch techniques such as the sleeper stretch. Care must be taken with the sleeper stretch as there is an opportunity for it to generate an increase in compressive symptoms if not undertaken with care.

 

The role of the rotator cuff is paramount in preventing humeral head migration. The rotator cuff originates from the scapula and as such the scapula plays an important role in defining the length-tension relationship of the rotator cuff (Kibler, 1998). As discussed previously, swimmers’ with shoulder pain often display reduced activity in the muscles that stabilise the scapula e.g. serratus anterior, rhomboids and lower trapezius.

 

Mosely et al (1992) undertook a piece of research to assess the effectiveness of different prone exercises in recruiting the scapula stabilisers. Prone exercises are particularly favourable as they can potentially mimic common swimming positions. The results are summarised below:

prone exercise peak arc

 

These results can help assist in choosing appropriate exercise that focus on increasing the endurance of the serratus anterior, lower trapezius, and subscapularis muscles. The four most widely used exercises supported both in research and clinical experiences are scapular elevation (scaption), push-ups with a plus, rowing, and press-ups.  Some of these exercises may already be in a swimmer’s dry land programme and as such it is important to check technique and prescription. In my experience it works well to work to fatigue with these exercises, repeating 3-4 sets of each exercise per session. Given the high volume of pool based training these athlete’s undertake, it is useful to carry out these exercises after swimming or as an isolated workout session in order to minimise the effect on the swimming training. It is also worth bearing in mind that strength gains will be mitigated by cardiovascular training and as such 12-24 hours between pool and land training will contribute to more strength gains in a strength focused rehab.

 

Whilst there is a strong focus on scapular stabilisation within these 4 exercises, they also contribute to development rotator cuff strength-endurance. The prone scaption exercise for example (Y shape) as well as targeting the middle and lower trapezius fibres will also challenge the suprapsinatus (a key muscle in maintaining humeral head position). Whilst many practitioners will focus on attempting to isolate the rotator cuff with theraband exercises, I believe it is also useful to build in more functional complex movements that challenge the rotator cuff such as the military press, lat raises, lat pull downs and bent over rows.

 

Whilst many swimmers should be incorporating a dryland training it is valuable to liaise with coaches and the athlete to ascertain the content. There should be a focus on trubnk stability and strength endurance with an emphasis on pelvic positioning. Achieving a neutral pelvis and avoiding avoid excessive anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis is a key teaching point. Exercises that focus on improving dissociation of the trunk on the pelvis and the pelvis on the hips are fundamental. Common exercises to assist in the process are dynamic plank variations, mountain climbers, swiss ball exercises, deadbugs, bridging varitations and greyhounds.

 

Periodisation of rehabilitation with training

Swimmers are reluctant to remove themselves from pool training as such it is likely that you will need to advise on the adaptation of training schedules and techniques in order to allow the athlete to continue to swim to some degree but also achieve the desired rest and/or adaptation required from rehabilitation. Modyfing a swimmer’s training will likely gain increased compliance with rehab than completing removing pool based training altogether. In some cases it may be necessary to remove the athlete from the pool altogether for a short period-although this is very rare in my experience. Ultimately time spent out of the water should be minimised and adjustments should be made to maintain as much pool training as possible, e.g.

 

  • Temporary reduction in training volume/frequency
  • Avoid the use of hand paddles and kickboards which increase load/leverage
  • Use swim fins to enhance the propulsion from the legs and reduce the stress on the shoulder
  • Alter training patterns so that different strokes are used more frequently throughout the practice.

 

 

Further reading:

Kibler B. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:325–339.

 

Mosely JB, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, Tibone J. EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:128-134.

 

Scovazzo ML, Browne A, Pink M, et al: The painful shoulder during freestyle

swimming: an electromyographic and cinematographic analysis of twelve

muscles. Am J Sports Med 1991;19(6):577-582

Swimmer’s Shoulder Part 1: Aetiology

Author: Becki Knight, Sports Physiotherapist, PhysioKinetic

Swimmer’s shoulder is characterised by pain in the anterior lateral aspect of the shoulder, although sometimes symptoms can migrate down the arm and into the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint. It is believed that swimmer’s shoulder is due to subacromial impingement involving the rotator cuff tendon, bicipital tendon, or subacromial bursa.

So why are swimmer’s at risk?

Swimmer’s often present with hypermobile shoulders- specifically increased anterior glenohumeral laxity. So as with overhead athletes, they present with excessive external rotation and limited internal rotation. This greater range of external rotation places greater demand on the rotator cuff and the long head of the biceps to prevent elevation and anterior translation humeral head. Any failure of the rotator cuff or scapular stabilizers to maintain the position of the humeral head can lead to excessive humeral head migration and either increased load on the tendons or compression of the tendons between the humeral head and acromian. It is likely that a combination of both exists in swimmer’s presenting with shoulder pain.

So why does this happen?

The causes are likely multi-factorial and are thought to be a result of a combination of: –

  • impaired posture
  • impaired glenohumeral joint mobility-specifically internal rotation
  • poor stroke technique ( impaired neuromuscular control or proprioception-depending on your terminology!!)
  • reduced muscle performance (either activation or strength)
  • overuse/inadequate recovery-training errors

However if we analyse the free-style swimming technique it gives us some insight into the potential reasons as to why swimmers are so at risk from these symptoms

So what happens during a free-style swimming stroke?

The stroke is split into 2 main phases- Pull through (early, mid and late) and Recovery (elbow lift, mid and late) (Richardson et al, 1980; Souza, 1994). More simply-catch, pull, and recovery. The table below gives an insight into both the kinematics and muscle action during these phases.

Phase Muscle Action Kinematics GH Jt Kinematics Scapula
Catch Hand enters water Upper trapezius and the rhomboids.

The serratus anterior protracts, rotates the scapula up, and is highly active from this point in the catch and through the pull. These opposing actions hold the scapula in place.

External rotation and abduction Upward rotation and retraction
Pull Just after the catch, the pectoralis major adducts the humerus while internal rotation is balanced by the antagonistic external rotation of the teres minor. The latissimus dorsi and subscapularis activate from mid pull. Internal rotation and adduction Downward rotation and adduction
Recovery Hand leaves water The deltoid and supraspinatus are the prime movers through recovery. External rotation and abduction Protraction and upward rotation

So what implication does this have?

We can see from the table that the free style stroke will increase strength in the shoulder adductors, extensors and internal rotators. In fact swimmers often show a reduction in their external to internal rotator endurance ratios (Fowler, 1990). Falkel et al. (1987) argued that this ratio was correlated to shoulder pain in swimmers. They also postulated that when the ratio of external rotator to internal rotator endurance dropped below 50% the swimmer no longer had sufficient endurance to maintain optimal stroke mechanics during the recovery phase thus increasing the risk of subacromial pain. Pink et al (1996) argued weakness in serratus anterior and increased rhomboid activation during the pull to be responsible for pain in swimmers. They hypothesised that this muscle imbalance causes impingement of the biceps tendon and supraspinatus due to altered scapula kinematics.

Another key contributing factor for swimmers is the volume of training that is undertaken compared to other overhead sports. Johnson et al, (1987) assessed the training habits of several upper limb dominant sports. They reported that on the average shoulder revolutions per week of a golfer, javelin thrower, baseball pitcher and swimmer (see table below).

Sport Revolutions per week Injury incidence at Clinic
Golf 200 7%
Javelin Thrower 300 29%
Baseball Pitcher 1000 57%
Swimmer 16000 66%

These statistics may have actually been too conservative as Kammer, Young, Niedfeldt (1999) calculated that highly competitive swimmers actually perform more than 1 million shoulder revolutions per week. The implications for this are significant given that shoulder injuries are occur 30% and 38% of all swimming injuries per year (Bak et al, 1989 & Cole et al 2002). In fact, McMaster and Troup (1993) reported a lifetime shoulder injury incidence of 47% to 73% for competitive swimmers.

Rehabilitation and injury prevention.

 Treatment and prevention of this condition has historically focused on addressing high risk factors associated with the condition. Continual analysis of swim stroke is paramount to ensure that stroke mechanics are optimised for performance and injury prevention.

Exercises aimed at addressing deficits in muscle and joint function are the main stay of managing this condition. An example of common rehabilitation goals are:-

  • improve glenohumeral joint instability
  • reduce posterior capsule restrictions
  • improve muscle endurance specifically serratus anterior and subscapularis

A follow up article will focus on discussing rehabilitation strategies and exercise prescription.

 

References

Bak K, Bue P, Olsson G: Injury patterns in Danish competitive swimming. Ugeskr Laeger 1989;151(45):2982-2984

Cole A, Johnson JN, Fredericson M: Injury incidence in competitive swimmers. Presented at USA Sports Medicine Society and American Swim Coaches Association meeting; September 7, 2002; Las Vegas

Kammer CS, Young CC, Niedfeldt MW: Swimming injuries and illnesses. Phys Sportsmed 1999;27(4):51-60

McMaster WC, Troup J: A survey of interfering shoulder pain in United States competitive swimmers. Am J Sports Med 1993;21(1):67-70.

Pink M, Jobe F: Biomechanics of swimming, in Zachazewski JE, Magee DJ, Quillen WS: Athletic Injuries and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996, p 317

Souza TA: The shoulder in swimming, in Sports Injuries of the Shoulder: Conservative Management. New York City, Churchill Livingstone, 1994, pp 107-24